It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NTR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NTR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
NTR (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +11.35% price change this week, while UAN (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +6.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.59%.
NTR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| NTR | UAN | NTR / UAN | |
| Capitalization | 29B | 1.03B | 2,827% |
| EBITDA | 4.99B | 241M | 2,071% |
| Gain YTD | 38.415 | 45.938 | 84% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.21 | 8.06 | 201% |
| Revenue | 26B | 615M | 4,228% |
| Total Cash | 775M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 13.6B | 574M | 2,369% |
NTR | UAN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 31 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UAN's Valuation (3) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NTR (29). This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to NTR’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTR (69). This means that UAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTR’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's SMR Rating (24) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTR (83). This means that UAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTR’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NTR (51). This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to NTR’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NTR (92). This means that UAN’s stock grew similarly to NTR’s over the last 12 months.
| NTR | UAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 63% | 17 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSSS | 30.36 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| Monarch Select Subsector ETF | |||
| FSST | 30.92 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Equity ETF | |||
| IBDT | 25.45 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF | |||
| IBD | 24.15 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Inspire Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| WEEL | 20.46 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
| Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTR has been closely correlated with CF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTR jumps, then CF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTR | 100% | +1.35% | ||
| CF - NTR | 67% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| MOS - NTR | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| IPI - NTR | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| CTVA - NTR | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| KPLUY - NTR | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.38% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UAN has been loosely correlated with CF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UAN jumps, then CF could also see price increases.