NTPIF
Price
$4.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
291.87M
UCASU
Price
$1.13
Change
+$0.12 (+12.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTPIF vs UCASU

Header iconNTPIF vs UCASU Comparison
Open Charts NTPIF vs UCASUBanner chart's image
Nam Tai Property
Price$4.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.13K
Capitalization291.87M
UC Asset
Price$1.13
Change+$0.12 (+12.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.49M
NTPIF vs UCASU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCASU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTPIF vs. UCASU commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTPIF is a Hold and UCASU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NTPIF: $4.10 vs. UCASU: $1.13)
Brand notoriety: NTPIF and UCASU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTPIF: 40% vs. UCASU: 26%
Market capitalization -- NTPIF: $291.87M vs. UCASU: $5.49M
NTPIF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $291.87M. UCASU’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $5.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTPIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUCASU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NTPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UCASU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NTPIF and UCASU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTPIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCASU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTPIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UCASU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTPIF is a better buy in the short-term than UCASU.

Price Growth

NTPIF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UCASU (@Real Estate Development) price change was +12.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTPIF($292M) has a higher market cap than UCASU($5.49M). UCASU has higher P/E ratio than NTPIF: UCASU (5.80) vs NTPIF (4.23). UCASU YTD gains are higher at: 60.714 vs. NTPIF (-13.684).
NTPIFUCASUNTPIF / UCASU
Capitalization292M5.49M5,324%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.68460.714-23%
P/E Ratio4.235.8073%
RevenueN/A7.01M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A400K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTPIF: Fundamental Ratings
NTPIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTPIFUCASU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCASU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FZIPX14.290.09
+0.63%
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index
AUIAX35.510.14
+0.40%
AB Equity Income A
GSPFX19.180.07
+0.37%
Gotham Enhanced S&P 500 Index Instl
CEISX13.700.05
+0.37%
Manning & Napier Callodine Equity Inc S
MKVCX16.26-0.06
-0.37%
MFS International Large Cap Value C

NTPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTPIF and UCASU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTPIF and UCASU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTPIF
1D Price
Change %
NTPIF100%
N/A
UCASU - NTPIF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMR - NTPIF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
KW - NTPIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
FSV - NTPIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
CIGI - NTPIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More

UCASU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCASU has been loosely correlated with WARFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UCASU jumps, then WARFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCASU
1D Price
Change %
UCASU100%
N/A
WARFF - UCASU
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NTPIF - UCASU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRE - UCASU
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURDF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VESTF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More