Advertisement
NTOIY vs PKIUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTOIY is a Hold and PKIUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NTOIY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePKIUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NTOIY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PKIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NTOIY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PKIUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NTOIY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PKIUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NTOIY (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while PKIUF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
NTOIY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.55% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| NTOIY | PKIUF | NTOIY / PKIUF | |
| Capitalization | 13.1B | 4.91B | 267% |
| EBITDA | -96M | 1.4B | -7% |
| Gain YTD | 43.379 | 24.612 | 176% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.11 | 22.89 | 88% |
| Revenue | 20.7B | 28.2B | 73% |
| Total Cash | 981M | 362M | 271% |
| Total Debt | 5.34B | 6.61B | 81% |
NTOIY | PKIUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTOIY's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (45). This means that NTOIY’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.
PKIUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as NTOIY (100). This means that PKIUF’s stock grew similarly to NTOIY’s over the last 12 months.
PKIUF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as NTOIY (92). This means that PKIUF’s stock grew similarly to NTOIY’s over the last 12 months.
NTOIY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (57). This means that NTOIY’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.
NTOIY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (21). This means that NTOIY’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.
| NTOIY | PKIUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NUMI | 24.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Municipal Income ETF | |||
| SPSK | 18.36 | -0.06 | -0.33% |
| SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF | |||
| SPYC | 41.65 | -0.24 | -0.58% |
| Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | |||
| QQQA | 45.26 | -0.41 | -0.90% |
| ProShares Nasdaq-100 Drsy Wght Momt ETF | |||
| BULZ | 209.48 | -3.34 | -1.57% |
| MicroSectors™ Slct FANG Inn 3X Lvgd ETNs | |||
NTOIY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTOIY and CTXAF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTOIY and CTXAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTOIY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTOIY | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| CTXAF - NTOIY | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RBSFY - NTOIY | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.26% | ||
| RUBSF - NTOIY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NTOIF - NTOIY | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
| PKIUF - NTOIY | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
More | ||||
PKIUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PKIUF and RBSFY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PKIUF and RBSFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PKIUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PKIUF | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| RBSFY - PKIUF | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.26% | ||
| CTXAF - PKIUF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NTOIY - PKIUF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| NTOIF - PKIUF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
| HEOL - PKIUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||