NTOIF
Price
$18.86
Change
-$0.79 (-4.02%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.52B
RUBSF
Price
$33.31
Change
+$0.43 (+1.31%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTOIF vs RUBSF

Header iconNTOIF vs RUBSF Comparison
Open Charts NTOIF vs RUBSFBanner chart's image
Neste OYJ
Price$18.86
Change-$0.79 (-4.02%)
Volume$409
Capitalization14.52B
RUBIS
Price$33.31
Change+$0.43 (+1.31%)
Volume$165
Capitalization3.83B
NTOIF vs RUBSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTOIF vs. RUBSF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTOIF is a Hold and RUBSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NTOIF: $18.86 vs. RUBSF: $33.31)
Brand notoriety: NTOIF and RUBSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTOIF: 18% vs. RUBSF: 15%
Market capitalization -- NTOIF: $14.52B vs. RUBSF: $3.83B
NTOIF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $14.52B. RUBSF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $3.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $60.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $7.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTOIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUBSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NTOIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUBSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTOIF is a better buy in the long-term than RUBSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTOIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUBSF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTOIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUBSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUBSF is a better buy in the short-term than NTOIF.

Price Growth

NTOIF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while RUBSF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.44% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTOIF($14.5B) has a higher market cap than RUBSF($3.83B). NTOIF has higher P/E ratio than RUBSF: NTOIF (20.00) vs RUBSF (7.81). NTOIF YTD gains are higher at: 57.167 vs. RUBSF (40.549).
NTOIFRUBSFNTOIF / RUBSF
Capitalization14.5B3.83B379%
EBITDA-96MN/A-
Gain YTD57.16740.549141%
P/E Ratio20.007.81256%
Revenue20.7BN/A-
Total Cash981MN/A-
Total Debt5.34BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTOIF vs RUBSF: Fundamental Ratings
NTOIF
RUBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9362
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1433
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTOIF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUBSF (89). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

NTOIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBSF (100). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

RUBSF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as NTOIF (93). This means that RUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NTOIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTOIF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBSF (50). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

NTOIF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBSF (33). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTOIFRUBSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
37%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTMX2.900.06
+2.11%
CytomX Therapeutics
BSAC26.350.12
+0.46%
Banco Santander-Chile
EFSC58.840.22
+0.38%
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
BKYI0.75-0.01
-0.71%
BIO-key International
FATN6.38-0.17
-2.60%
FatPipe Inc.

NTOIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTOIF and CAPL have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTOIF and CAPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTOIF
1D Price
Change %
NTOIF100%
-4.02%
CAPL - NTOIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
CTXAF - NTOIF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDKOF - NTOIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDKOY - NTOIF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
JXHGF - NTOIF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RUBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBSF and RBSFY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBSF and RBSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUBSF
1D Price
Change %
RUBSF100%
N/A
RBSFY - RUBSF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPTJF - RUBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIY - RUBSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
NTOIF - RUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
OILRF - RUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More