NTOIF
Price
$18.86
Change
-$0.79 (-4.02%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.52B
PKIUF
Price
$27.64
Change
+$0.21 (+0.77%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.82B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTOIF vs PKIUF

Header iconNTOIF vs PKIUF Comparison
Open Charts NTOIF vs PKIUFBanner chart's image
Neste OYJ
Price$18.86
Change-$0.79 (-4.02%)
Volume$409
Capitalization14.52B
Parkland
Price$27.64
Change+$0.21 (+0.77%)
Volume$816
Capitalization4.82B
NTOIF vs PKIUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PKIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTOIF vs. PKIUF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTOIF is a Hold and PKIUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NTOIF: $18.86 vs. PKIUF: $27.64)
Brand notoriety: NTOIF and PKIUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTOIF: 18% vs. PKIUF: 20%
Market capitalization -- NTOIF: $14.52B vs. PKIUF: $4.82B
NTOIF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $14.52B. PKIUF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $4.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $60.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $7.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTOIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePKIUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NTOIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PKIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTOIF is a better buy in the long-term than PKIUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTOIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PKIUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTOIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PKIUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTOIF is a better buy in the short-term than PKIUF.

Price Growth

NTOIF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while PKIUF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.44% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTOIF($14.5B) has a higher market cap than PKIUF($4.82B). PKIUF has higher P/E ratio than NTOIF: PKIUF (22.73) vs NTOIF (20.00). NTOIF YTD gains are higher at: 57.167 vs. PKIUF (22.463). PKIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.54B vs. NTOIF (-96M). NTOIF has more cash in the bank: 981M vs. PKIUF (439M). NTOIF has less debt than PKIUF: NTOIF (5.34B) vs PKIUF (6.47B). PKIUF has higher revenues than NTOIF: PKIUF (27.5B) vs NTOIF (20.7B).
NTOIFPKIUFNTOIF / PKIUF
Capitalization14.5B4.82B301%
EBITDA-96M1.54B-6%
Gain YTD57.16722.463254%
P/E Ratio20.0022.7388%
Revenue20.7B27.5B75%
Total Cash981M439M223%
Total Debt5.34B6.47B83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTOIF vs PKIUF: Fundamental Ratings
NTOIF
PKIUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9373
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1417
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTOIF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (41). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.

NTOIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (100). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.

PKIUF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as NTOIF (93). This means that PKIUF’s stock grew similarly to NTOIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTOIF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (55). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.

NTOIF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (17). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTOIFPKIUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PKIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTMX2.900.06
+2.11%
CytomX Therapeutics
BSAC26.350.12
+0.46%
Banco Santander-Chile
EFSC58.840.22
+0.38%
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
BKYI0.75-0.01
-0.71%
BIO-key International
FATN6.38-0.17
-2.60%
FatPipe Inc.

NTOIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTOIF and CAPL have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTOIF and CAPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTOIF
1D Price
Change %
NTOIF100%
-4.02%
CAPL - NTOIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
CTXAF - NTOIF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDKOF - NTOIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDKOY - NTOIF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
JXHGF - NTOIF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PKIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PKIUF and RBSFY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PKIUF and RBSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PKIUF
1D Price
Change %
PKIUF100%
+0.77%
RBSFY - PKIUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXAF - PKIUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIY - PKIUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
NTOIF - PKIUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
HEOL - PKIUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More