It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NTNX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQIFTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NTNX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
NTNX (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while QIFTF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.56%.
NTNX is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
NTNX | QIFTF | NTNX / QIFTF | |
Capitalization | 15.2B | 39.7M | 38,287% |
EBITDA | 94.1M | 2.34M | 4,021% |
Gain YTD | 49.067 | 39.697 | 124% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.02B | 37.5M | 5,384% |
Total Cash | 1.64B | 5.22M | 31,518% |
Total Debt | 1.35B | 15.2M | 8,901% |
NTNX | QIFTF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTNX's Valuation (36) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QIFTF (94) in the null industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew somewhat faster than QIFTF’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QIFTF (100) in the null industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew significantly faster than QIFTF’s over the last 12 months.
QIFTF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as NTNX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QIFTF’s stock grew similarly to NTNX’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QIFTF (51) in the null industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew similarly to QIFTF’s over the last 12 months.
QIFTF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTNX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QIFTF’s stock grew significantly faster than NTNX’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTNX has been loosely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTNX jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTNX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NTNX | 100% | -0.86% | ||
CRM - NTNX | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
PATH - NTNX | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.58% | ||
NOW - NTNX | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
DSGX - NTNX | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.43% | ||
CRWD - NTNX | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QIFTF has been loosely correlated with VERX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QIFTF jumps, then VERX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QIFTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QIFTF | 100% | N/A | ||
VERX - QIFTF | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
BAND - QIFTF | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
NTNX - QIFTF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
AI - QIFTF | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
DUOL - QIFTF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
More |