NTNOF
Price
$0.58
Change
+$0.02 (+3.57%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
281.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOC
Price
$8.27
Change
+$0.18 (+2.22%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.17B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTNOF vs SOC

Header iconNTNOF vs SOC Comparison
Open Charts NTNOF vs SOCBanner chart's image
NORTHERN OCEAN
Price$0.58
Change+$0.02 (+3.57%)
Volume$5.77K
Capitalization281.3M
Sable Offshore
Price$8.27
Change+$0.18 (+2.22%)
Volume$42.8K
Capitalization1.17B
NTNOF vs SOC Comparison Chart in %
NTNOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTNOF vs. SOC commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTNOF is a Hold and SOC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (NTNOF: $0.60 vs. SOC: $8.09)
Brand notoriety: NTNOF and SOC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTNOF: 100% vs. SOC: 113%
Market capitalization -- NTNOF: $281.3M vs. SOC: $1.17B
NTNOF [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $281.3M. SOC’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $6.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTNOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NTNOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTNOF is a better buy in the long-term than SOC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTNOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTNOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOC is a better buy in the short-term than NTNOF.

Price Growth

NTNOF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOC (@Contract Drilling) price change was -18.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

SOC is expected to report earnings on Mar 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (+2.69% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOC($1.17B) has a higher market cap than NTNOF($281M). NTNOF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SOC (-10.310). NTNOF has more cash in the bank: 43.8M vs. SOC (41.6M). NTNOF has less debt than SOC: NTNOF (541M) vs SOC (916M).
NTNOFSOCNTNOF / SOC
Capitalization281M1.17B24%
EBITDA54.9MN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-10.310-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue234MN/A-
Total Cash43.8M41.6M105%
Total Debt541M916M59%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTNOFSOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTNOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCRIX23.490.14
+0.60%
Leuthold Core Investment Institutional
TIERX8.99N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq A
VYSEX14.84-0.09
-0.60%
Voya MI Dynamic Small Cap R6
UIVPX12.80-0.10
-0.78%
MFS Intrinsic Value R3
HADAX29.16-0.35
-1.19%
Hartford Balanced HLS IA

NTNOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTNOF and ESVIF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTNOF and ESVIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTNOF
1D Price
Change %
NTNOF100%
N/A
ESVIF - NTNOF
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
AKTAF - NTNOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
SOC - NTNOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-10.21%
PHXHF - NTNOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
NE - NTNOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
More

SOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOC has been loosely correlated with TWLVU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOC jumps, then TWLVU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOC
1D Price
Change %
SOC100%
-10.21%
TWLVU - SOC
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXAI - SOC
41%
Loosely correlated
-5.58%
PTEN - SOC
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
PDS - SOC
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
RIG - SOC
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
More