NTNOF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
180.44M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHXHF
Price
$4.93
Change
-$0.21 (-4.09%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
223.14M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTNOF vs PHXHF

Header iconNTNOF vs PHXHF Comparison
Open Charts NTNOF vs PHXHFBanner chart's image
NORTHERN OCEAN
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization180.44M
PHX Energy Services
Price$4.93
Change-$0.21 (-4.09%)
Volume$8.18K
Capitalization223.14M
NTNOF vs PHXHF Comparison Chart in %
NTNOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHXHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTNOF vs. PHXHF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTNOF is a Hold and PHXHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NTNOF: $0.60 vs. PHXHF: $4.93)
Brand notoriety: NTNOF and PHXHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTNOF: 54% vs. PHXHF: 42%
Market capitalization -- NTNOF: $180.44M vs. PHXHF: $223.14M
NTNOF [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $180.44M. PHXHF’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $223.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $5.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTNOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHXHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NTNOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHXHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHXHF is a better buy in the long-term than NTNOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTNOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHXHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTNOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PHXHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTNOF is a better buy in the short-term than PHXHF.

Price Growth

NTNOF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PHXHF (@Contract Drilling) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (+1.38% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHXHF($223M) has a higher market cap than NTNOF($180M). NTNOF YTD gains are higher at: -8.815 vs. PHXHF (-20.756). PHXHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 123M vs. NTNOF (41.4M). NTNOF has more cash in the bank: 28.1M vs. PHXHF (10.7M). PHXHF has less debt than NTNOF: PHXHF (74.7M) vs NTNOF (548M). PHXHF has higher revenues than NTNOF: PHXHF (701M) vs NTNOF (216M).
NTNOFPHXHFNTNOF / PHXHF
Capitalization180M223M81%
EBITDA41.4M123M34%
Gain YTD-8.815-20.75642%
P/E RatioN/A6.40-
Revenue216M701M31%
Total Cash28.1M10.7M263%
Total Debt548M74.7M734%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PHXHF: Fundamental Ratings
PHXHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTNOFPHXHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTNOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHXHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNEMX23.600.16
+0.68%
JPMorgan International Equity R6
THOVX47.990.30
+0.63%
Thornburg Global Opportunities R4
EILIX13.860.02
+0.14%
Eaton Vance International Small-Cap I
REQAX48.690.03
+0.06%
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq A
PICEX7.71-0.01
-0.13%
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity C

NTNOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTNOF and ESVIF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTNOF and ESVIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTNOF
1D Price
Change %
NTNOF100%
N/A
ESVIF - NTNOF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
AKTAF - NTNOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
SOC - NTNOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-11.48%
PHXHF - NTNOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
NE - NTNOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
More

PHXHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHXHF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHXHF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHXHF
1D Price
Change %
PHXHF100%
-0.54%
PDS - PHXHF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
ESVIF - PHXHF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
RIG - PHXHF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
SDRL - PHXHF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
PTEN - PHXHF
37%
Loosely correlated
-6.57%
More