NTIOF
Price
$99.38
Change
+$0.21 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
26.32B
74 days until earnings call
SVNLY
Price
$6.57
Change
-$0.11 (-1.65%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.44B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTIOF vs SVNLY

Header iconNTIOF vs SVNLY Comparison
Open Charts NTIOF vs SVNLYBanner chart's image
National Bank of Canada
Price$99.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.21%)
Volume$103.09K
Capitalization26.32B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$6.57
Change-$0.11 (-1.65%)
Volume$88.66K
Capitalization17.44B
NTIOF vs SVNLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
NTIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTIOF vs. SVNLY commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTIOF is a Buy and SVNLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NTIOF: $99.38 vs. SVNLY: $6.57)
Brand notoriety: NTIOF and SVNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTIOF: 155% vs. SVNLY: 64%
Market capitalization -- NTIOF: $26.32B vs. SVNLY: $17.44B
NTIOF [@Major Banks] is valued at $26.32B. SVNLY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $17.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTIOF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NTIOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVNLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NTIOF and SVNLY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTIOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTIOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVNLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVNLY is a better buy in the short-term than NTIOF.

Price Growth

NTIOF (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while SVNLY (@Major Banks) price change was -1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

NTIOF is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

SVNLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.34% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTIOF($26.3B) has a higher market cap than SVNLY($17.4B). NTIOF has higher P/E ratio than SVNLY: NTIOF (11.05) vs SVNLY (7.17). SVNLY YTD gains are higher at: 65.876 vs. NTIOF (9.077). NTIOF has less debt than SVNLY: NTIOF (47.9B) vs SVNLY (1.6T). SVNLY has higher revenues than NTIOF: SVNLY (57B) vs NTIOF (9.79B).
NTIOFSVNLYNTIOF / SVNLY
Capitalization26.3B17.4B151%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.07765.87614%
P/E Ratio11.057.17154%
Revenue9.79B57B17%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.9B1.6T3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTIOF vs SVNLY: Fundamental Ratings
NTIOF
SVNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7122
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1617
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3321
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTIOF's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (98). This means that NTIOF’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

NTIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (17). This means that NTIOF’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (8). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (44). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (33). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTIOFSVNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDLSX20.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Leisure
SCORX17.49N/A
N/A
Saturna Core
MDBAX19.42-0.25
-1.27%
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Inv A
TRZZX55.17-1.03
-1.83%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Z
RMBKX45.71-1.17
-2.50%
RMB Mendon Financial Services A

NTIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTIOF has been loosely correlated with ANZGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTIOF jumps, then ANZGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTIOF
1D Price
Change %
NTIOF100%
+0.21%
ANZGY - NTIOF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
SVNLY - NTIOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
SCBFF - NTIOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
MBFJF - NTIOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NAUBF - NTIOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SVNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLY has been loosely correlated with NABZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLY jumps, then NABZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLY
1D Price
Change %
SVNLY100%
-1.65%
NABZY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
ANZGY - SVNLY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
SVNLF - SVNLY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
NTIOF - SVNLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
SCBFY - SVNLY
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
More