NTIOF
Price
$108.03
Change
+$0.25 (+0.23%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
42.51B
67 days until earnings call
SCBFF
Price
$19.64
Change
+$0.85 (+4.52%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
43.99B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTIOF vs SCBFF

Header iconNTIOF vs SCBFF Comparison
Open Charts NTIOF vs SCBFFBanner chart's image
National Bank of Canada
Price$108.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.23%)
Volume$52.25K
Capitalization42.51B
Standard Chartered
Price$19.64
Change+$0.85 (+4.52%)
Volume$4.5K
Capitalization43.99B
NTIOF vs SCBFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTIOF vs. SCBFF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTIOF is a Hold and SCBFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NTIOF: $108.03 vs. SCBFF: $19.64)
Brand notoriety: NTIOF and SCBFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTIOF: 86% vs. SCBFF: 16%
Market capitalization -- NTIOF: $42.51B vs. SCBFF: $43.99B
NTIOF [@Major Banks] is valued at $42.51B. SCBFF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $43.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $136.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTIOF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NTIOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SCBFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the long-term than NTIOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTIOF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTIOF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCBFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the short-term than NTIOF.

Price Growth

NTIOF (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while SCBFF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

NTIOF is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

SCBFF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFF($44B) and NTIOF($42.5B) have the same market capitalization . NTIOF has higher P/E ratio than SCBFF: NTIOF (14.79) vs SCBFF (10.80). SCBFF YTD gains are higher at: 68.829 vs. NTIOF (18.571). NTIOF (97.8B) and SCBFF (99.4B) have identical debt. SCBFF has higher revenues than NTIOF: SCBFF (20.5B) vs NTIOF (13.3B).
NTIOFSCBFFNTIOF / SCBFF
Capitalization42.5B44B97%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.57168.82927%
P/E Ratio14.7910.80137%
Revenue13.3B20.5B65%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt97.8B99.4B98%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTIOF vs SCBFF: Fundamental Ratings
NTIOF
SCBFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7794
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
218
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2925
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
552

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTIOF (100). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (21). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (8). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (49). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (29). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTIOFSCBFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLX6.960.23
+3.42%
Helix Energy Solutions Group
ARKR7.300.18
+2.53%
Ark Restaurants Corp
CAMT104.631.27
+1.23%
Camtek Ltd
ET17.460.05
+0.29%
Energy Transfer LP
TLSI4.70-0.06
-1.26%
TriSalus Life Sciences

NTIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTIOF has been loosely correlated with ANZGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTIOF jumps, then ANZGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTIOF
1D Price
Change %
NTIOF100%
+0.23%
ANZGY - NTIOF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
SVNLY - NTIOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
SCBFF - NTIOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
MBFJF - NTIOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
NAUBF - NTIOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFF has been loosely correlated with SCBFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFF jumps, then SCBFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFF
1D Price
Change %
SCBFF100%
+4.55%
SCBFY - SCBFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.73%
MBFJF - SCBFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
NTIOF - SCBFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
IDCBY - SCBFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
NAUBF - SCBFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More