NTIOF
Price
$104.27
Change
+$0.43 (+0.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.32B
52 days until earnings call
SCBFF
Price
$16.55
Change
+$0.24 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.81B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTIOF vs SCBFF

Header iconNTIOF vs SCBFF Comparison
Open Charts NTIOF vs SCBFFBanner chart's image
National Bank of Canada
Price$104.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.41%)
Volume$10.66K
Capitalization26.32B
Standard Chartered
Price$16.55
Change+$0.24 (+1.47%)
Volume$4.27K
Capitalization26.81B
NTIOF vs SCBFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTIOF vs. SCBFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTIOF is a StrongBuy and SCBFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NTIOF: $104.27 vs. SCBFF: $16.55)
Brand notoriety: NTIOF and SCBFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTIOF: 18% vs. SCBFF: 63%
Market capitalization -- NTIOF: $26.32B vs. SCBFF: $26.81B
NTIOF [@Major Banks] is valued at $26.32B. SCBFF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTIOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NTIOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the long-term than NTIOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTIOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTIOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCBFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the short-term than NTIOF.

Price Growth

NTIOF (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.52% price change this week, while SCBFF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

NTIOF is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

SCBFF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.55% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFF($26.8B) and NTIOF($26.3B) have the same market capitalization . NTIOF has higher P/E ratio than SCBFF: NTIOF (11.05) vs SCBFF (9.82). SCBFF YTD gains are higher at: 41.297 vs. NTIOF (14.444). NTIOF has less debt than SCBFF: NTIOF (47.9B) vs SCBFF (93.9B). SCBFF has higher revenues than NTIOF: SCBFF (17.1B) vs NTIOF (9.79B).
NTIOFSCBFFNTIOF / SCBFF
Capitalization26.3B26.8B98%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.44441.29735%
P/E Ratio11.059.82112%
Revenue9.79B17.1B57%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.9B93.9B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTIOF vs SCBFF: Fundamental Ratings
NTIOF
SCBFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1512
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3417
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTIOF (100). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew significantly faster than NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (15). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (8). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (44). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as NTIOF (34). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTIOFSCBFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCWO0.210.02
+8.63%
374Water
ASAN13.970.46
+3.40%
Asana
NTR60.140.15
+0.25%
Nutrien Ltd
SQFT5.14N/A
N/A
Presidio Property Trust Inc
FVRR28.90-0.20
-0.69%
Fiverr International Ltd

NTIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTIOF has been loosely correlated with ANZGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTIOF jumps, then ANZGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTIOF
1D Price
Change %
NTIOF100%
+0.41%
ANZGY - NTIOF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.00%
SVNLY - NTIOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
SCBFF - NTIOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
MBFJF - NTIOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NAUBF - NTIOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
More

SCBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFF has been loosely correlated with SCBFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFF jumps, then SCBFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFF
1D Price
Change %
SCBFF100%
+1.50%
SCBFY - SCBFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
MBFJF - SCBFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTIOF - SCBFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
IDCBY - SCBFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
NAUBF - SCBFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
More