Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NTIAX vs VIMSX
NTIAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts NTIAX vs VIMSX
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$15.00
Change+$0.15 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.55B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.84
Change+$0.88 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
NTIAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NTIAX vs. VIMSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTIAX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. NTIAX (2.55B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: VIMSX (1.35) vs NTIAX (1.03). NTIAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: NTIAX (25 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). NTIAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). NTIAX (16.00) and VIMSX (16.00) have comparable annual turnover. NTIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: NTIAX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. NTIAX (-3.04). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.75 vs. NTIAX (15.26).
| NTIAX | VIMSX | NTIAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.17 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.719 | 10.845 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 199B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.04 | 11.57 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 55.74 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.26 | 70.75 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.87 | 160.66 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement