Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NTIAX vs VIMSX
NTIAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts NTIAX vs VIMSX
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$14.62
Change+$0.09 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$77.52
Change+$0.46 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
NTIAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NTIAX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTIAX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. NTIAX (2.58B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: VIMSX (1.40) vs NTIAX (1.07). NTIAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: NTIAX (25 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). NTIAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). NTIAX (16.00) and VIMSX (16.00) have comparable annual turnover. NTIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: NTIAX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. NTIAX (1.10). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.64 vs. NTIAX (14.96).
| NTIAX | VIMSX | NTIAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.17 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.17 | 347% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.117 | 7.625 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.40 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 17.63 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.35 | 43.06 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | 73.64 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.49 | 127.44 | -1% |