NTBP
Price
$1150.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
72.56M
PONT
Price
$555.00
Change
+$3.00 (+0.54%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
114.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTBP vs PONT

Header iconNTBP vs PONT Comparison
Open Charts NTBP vs PONTBanner chart's image
New Tripoli Ban
Price$1150.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1
Capitalization72.56M
Pontiac Ban
Price$555.00
Change+$3.00 (+0.54%)
Volume$14
Capitalization114.84M
NTBP vs PONT Comparison Chart in %
NTBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTBP vs. PONT commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTBP is a Hold and PONT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NTBP: $1150.00 vs. PONT: $555.00)
Brand notoriety: NTBP and PONT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTBP: 4% vs. PONT: 13%
Market capitalization -- NTBP: $72.56M vs. PONT: $114.84M
NTBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $72.56M. PONT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $114.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePONT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NTBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PONT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTBP is a better buy in the long-term than PONT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PONT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PONT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PONT is a better buy in the short-term than NTBP.

Price Growth

NTBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PONT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONT($115M) has a higher market cap than NTBP($72.6M). NTBP has higher P/E ratio than PONT: NTBP (20.67) vs PONT (9.86). NTBP YTD gains are higher at: 30.666 vs. PONT (6.282). PONT has higher revenues than NTBP: PONT (39.5M) vs NTBP (15.8M).
NTBPPONTNTBP / PONT
Capitalization72.6M115M63%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.6666.282488%
P/E Ratio20.679.86210%
Revenue15.8M39.5M40%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTBP vs PONT: Fundamental Ratings
NTBP
PONT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
7355
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2466
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5034

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PONT's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTBP (71). This means that PONT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTBP’s over the last 12 months.

PONT's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as NTBP (100). This means that PONT’s stock grew similarly to NTBP’s over the last 12 months.

PONT's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as NTBP (73). This means that PONT’s stock grew similarly to NTBP’s over the last 12 months.

NTBP's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as PONT (53). This means that NTBP’s stock grew similarly to PONT’s over the last 12 months.

NTBP's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PONT (66). This means that NTBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PONT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTBPPONT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FALC1.75N/A
N/A
FalconStor Software, Inc.
ICABY0.27N/A
N/A
i-CABLE Communications Ltd.
ILPMF2.79N/A
N/A
Permanent TSB Group Holdings plc
LLDTF1.10N/A
N/A
Lloyds Banking Group plc
GMVHY11.03-0.09
-0.85%
ENTAIN PLC

NTBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTBP and SLRK have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTBP and SLRK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTBP
1D Price
Change %
NTBP100%
N/A
SLRK - NTBP
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
HMLN - NTBP
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
NMBF - NTBP
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PONT - NTBP
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFBN - NTBP
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PONT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PONT has been loosely correlated with BPIRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PONT jumps, then BPIRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PONT
1D Price
Change %
PONT100%
N/A
BPIRF - PONT
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNBB - PONT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSBX - PONT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - PONT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSF - PONT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More