NSVLF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.3M
RMLRF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.02 (-1.25%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
858.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSVLF vs RMLRF

Header iconNSVLF vs RMLRF Comparison
Open Charts NSVLF vs RMLRFBanner chart's image
AUQ GOLD MNG
Price$0.24
Change+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization1.3M
Ramelius Resources
Price$1.57
Change-$0.02 (-1.25%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization858.29M
NSVLF vs RMLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSVLF vs. RMLRF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVLF is a Hold and RMLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NSVLF: $0.24 vs. RMLRF: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: NSVLF and RMLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSVLF: 147% vs. RMLRF: 30%
Market capitalization -- NSVLF: $1.3M vs. RMLRF: $858.29M
NSVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.3M. RMLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $858.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the long-term than NSVLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSVLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMLRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSVLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RMLRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSVLF is a better buy in the short-term than RMLRF.

Price Growth

NSVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RMLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -10.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($858M) has a higher market cap than NSVLF($1.3M). NSVLF YTD gains are higher at: 97.500 vs. RMLRF (25.000). RMLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249M vs. NSVLF (-161.43K). RMLRF has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. NSVLF (43.3K). NSVLF has less debt than RMLRF: NSVLF (219K) vs RMLRF (54M). RMLRF has higher revenues than NSVLF: RMLRF (598M) vs NSVLF (0).
NSVLFRMLRFNSVLF / RMLRF
Capitalization1.3M858M0%
EBITDA-161.43K249M-0%
Gain YTD97.50025.000390%
P/E RatioN/A57.47-
Revenue0598M-
Total Cash43.3K169M0%
Total Debt219K54M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSVLF vs RMLRF: Fundamental Ratings
NSVLF
RMLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071
SMR RATING
1..100
10034
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLRF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSVLF (49). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (100). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSVLF (100). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

NSVLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (51). This means that NSVLF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (100). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSVLFRMLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHC6.460.05
+0.78%
Bausch Health Companies
ENGN3.610.02
+0.56%
enGene Holdings
EXC42.51N/A
N/A
Exelon Corp
ORIC10.31-0.19
-1.81%
Oric Pharmaceuticals
CALC1.43-0.14
-8.92%
CalciMedica

NSVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSVLF has been loosely correlated with INCAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSVLF jumps, then INCAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSVLF
1D Price
Change %
NSVLF100%
N/A
INCAF - NSVLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RDEXF - NSVLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
RMLRF - NSVLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
MPVDF - NSVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.60%
NVGLF - NSVLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and NSVLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and NSVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
-1.56%
NSVLF - RMLRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIJMF - RMLRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAJIF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXROF - RMLRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+20.19%
More