NSVLF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.3M
NVGLF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSVLF vs NVGLF

Header iconNSVLF vs NVGLF Comparison
Open Charts NSVLF vs NVGLFBanner chart's image
AUQ GOLD MNG
Price$0.24
Change+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization1.3M
NV Gold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.55K
Capitalization4.35M
NSVLF vs NVGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSVLF vs. NVGLF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVLF is a Hold and NVGLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (NSVLF: $0.24 vs. NVGLF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: NSVLF and NVGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSVLF: 147% vs. NVGLF: 313%
Market capitalization -- NSVLF: $1.3M vs. NVGLF: $4.35M
NSVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.3M. NVGLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNVGLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NVGLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NSVLF is a better buy in the long-term than NVGLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSVLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVGLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSVLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NVGLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSVLF is a better buy in the short-term than NVGLF.

Price Growth

NSVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NVGLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVGLF($4.35M) has a higher market cap than NSVLF($1.3M). NSVLF YTD gains are higher at: 97.500 vs. NVGLF (-19.395). NSVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -161.43K vs. NVGLF (-2.18M). NVGLF has more cash in the bank: 394K vs. NSVLF (43.3K). NSVLF (0) and NVGLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NSVLFNVGLFNSVLF / NVGLF
Capitalization1.3M4.35M30%
EBITDA-161.43K-2.18M7%
Gain YTD97.500-19.395-503%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash43.3K394K11%
Total Debt219KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSVLF vs NVGLF: Fundamental Ratings
NSVLF
NVGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5070
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3589
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NVGLF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (49). This means that NVGLF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

NVGLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (100). This means that NVGLF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

NVGLF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (100). This means that NVGLF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

NSVLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVGLF (89). This means that NSVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

NSVLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NVGLF (100). This means that NSVLF’s stock grew similarly to NVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSVLFNVGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHR28.490.54
+1.93%
Phreesia
LXFR12.170.12
+1.00%
Luxfer Holdings PLC
ALK49.370.36
+0.73%
Alaska Air Group
HDB77.030.11
+0.14%
HDFC Bank Limited
CREX3.20-0.15
-4.48%
Creative Realities

NSVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSVLF has been loosely correlated with INCAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSVLF jumps, then INCAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSVLF
1D Price
Change %
NSVLF100%
N/A
INCAF - NSVLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RDEXF - NSVLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
RMLRF - NSVLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
MPVDF - NSVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.60%
NVGLF - NSVLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More

NVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVGLF and PMDRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVGLF and PMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVGLF
1D Price
Change %
NVGLF100%
-1.72%
PMDRF - NVGLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - NVGLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEWP - NVGLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
NSUPF - NVGLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
NSVLF - NVGLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More