NSVGF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.29M
SHTDF
Price
$2.42
Change
+$0.13 (+5.68%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
7.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSVGF vs SHTDF

Header iconNSVGF vs SHTDF Comparison
Open Charts NSVGF vs SHTDFBanner chart's image
Nass Vy Gateway
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization3.29M
Sinopharm Group
Price$2.42
Change+$0.13 (+5.68%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.42B
NSVGF vs SHTDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSVGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSVGF vs. SHTDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVGF is a Hold and SHTDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NSVGF: $0.01 vs. SHTDF: $2.42)
Brand notoriety: NSVGF and SHTDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSVGF: 100% vs. SHTDF: 8%
Market capitalization -- NSVGF: $3.29M vs. SHTDF: $7.42B
NSVGF [@Medical Distributors] is valued at $3.29M. SHTDF’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $7.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $85.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSVGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHTDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NSVGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHTDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHTDF is a better buy in the long-term than NSVGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSVGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHTDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSVGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SHTDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSVGF is a better buy in the short-term than SHTDF.

Price Growth

NSVGF (@Medical Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHTDF (@Medical Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Distributors (-1.23% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHTDF($7.42B) has a higher market cap than NSVGF($3.29M). NSVGF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SHTDF (-2.851).
NSVGFSHTDFNSVGF / SHTDF
Capitalization3.29M7.42B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-2.851-
P/E RatioN/A7.93-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSVGF vs SHTDF: Fundamental Ratings
NSVGF
SHTDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
10058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHTDF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSVGF (94). This means that SHTDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSVGF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVGF (100). This means that SHTDF’s stock grew similarly to NSVGF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTDF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSVGF (100). This means that SHTDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSVGF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTDF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVGF (77). This means that SHTDF’s stock grew similarly to NSVGF’s over the last 12 months.

SHTDF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSVGF (100). This means that SHTDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSVGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSVGFSHTDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSVGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBHE23.16N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds 2025 Term HY and Inc ETF
LFAO145.20N/A
N/A
LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF
LALT22.23-0.01
-0.04%
First Trust Multi-Strat Alt ETF
DJIA21.75-0.07
-0.32%
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
PDBC13.12-0.12
-0.91%
Invesco Optm Yd Dvrs Cdty Stra No K1 ETF

NSVGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSVGF and PDRX have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSVGF and PDRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSVGF
1D Price
Change %
NSVGF100%
N/A
PDRX - NSVGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHPMY - NSVGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHTDF - NSVGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAHLY - NSVGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMFPF - NSVGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHTDF and SHTDY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHTDF and SHTDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHTDF
1D Price
Change %
SHTDF100%
N/A
SHTDY - SHTDF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
ZYXI - SHTDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSVGF - SHTDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHPMY - SHTDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSM - SHTDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
More