Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSVAX vs WCMFX
NSVAX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSVAX vs WCMFX
Columbia Sm Cp Val and Inflection Inst
Price$14.31
Change-$0.27 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets810.02M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$10.89
Change-$0.14 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4M
NSVAX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSVAX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVAX is a StrongBuy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSVAX has more cash in the bank: 810M vs. WCMFX (7.41M). NSVAX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: NSVAX (1.30) vs WCMFX (0.00). NSVAX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: NSVAX (24 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NSVAX (1.11). NSVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). NSVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: NSVAX (2000) vs WCMFX (100000). NSVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.39 vs. WCMFX (-24.81). WCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.14 vs. NSVAX (3.88).
| NSVAX | WCMFX | NSVAX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.90 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.45 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.391 | -7.930 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 7.41M | 10,939% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.39 | -24.81 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.77 | 5.15 | -209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.88 | 15.14 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement