Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSVAX vs SSGSX
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NSVAX vs SSGSX
Columbia Sm Cp Val and Inflection Inst
Price$14.78
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.63M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. NSVAX (896M). NSVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NSVAX (1.29) vs SSGSX (0.47). NSVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NSVAX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NSVAX (1.11). NSVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). NSVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NSVAX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. NSVAX (-4.36). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. NSVAX (19.93).
| NSVAX | SSGSX | NSVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.782 | 2.046 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 896M | 5.64B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.47 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.36 | -1.56 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.54 | 3.97 | -89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.93 | 22.95 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.01 | 24.71 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement