Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSVAX vs SSGSX
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NSVAX vs SSGSX
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst
Price$13.67
Change+$0.11 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets851.15M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. NSVAX (851M). NSVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NSVAX (1.39) vs SSGSX (0.51). NSVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NSVAX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NSVAX (1.11). NSVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). NSVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NSVAX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.77 vs. NSVAX (-14.02). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.49 vs. NSVAX (15.59).
| NSVAX | SSGSX | NSVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.937 | -2.283 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 851M | 5.73B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.51 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.02 | -8.77 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.27 | -2.14 | 574% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.59 | 23.49 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.99 | 18.39 | -103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement