Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSVAX vs SSGSX
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NSVAX vs SSGSX
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst
Price$13.73
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets863.36M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
NSVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSVAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSVAX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. NSVAX (863M). NSVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NSVAX (1.39) vs SSGSX (0.51). NSVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NSVAX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NSVAX (1.11). NSVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). NSVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NSVAX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. NSVAX (-6.37). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.33 vs. NSVAX (21.41).
| NSVAX | SSGSX | NSVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.520 | -2.068 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 863M | 5.82B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.51 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.37 | -1.26 | 505% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.14 | 2.38 | -384% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.41 | 29.33 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.76 | 16.52 | -120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers