NSUPF
Price
$1.16
Change
-$0.06 (-4.92%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
199.63M
STLRF
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.02 (-1.94%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
124.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSUPF vs STLRF

Header iconNSUPF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts NSUPF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
Northern Superior Resources
Price$1.16
Change-$0.06 (-4.92%)
Volume$688.3K
Capitalization199.63M
STLLR GOLD
Price$1.01
Change-$0.02 (-1.94%)
Volume$174.18K
Capitalization124.26M
NSUPF vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSUPF vs. STLRF commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSUPF is a Hold and STLRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (NSUPF: $1.16 vs. STLRF: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: NSUPF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSUPF: 232% vs. STLRF: 391%
Market capitalization -- NSUPF: $199.63M vs. STLRF: $124.26M
NSUPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $199.63M. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $124.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSUPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NSUPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLRF is a better buy in the long-term than NSUPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSUPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSUPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STLRF is a better buy in the short-term than NSUPF.

Price Growth

NSUPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.49% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSUPF($200M) has a higher market cap than STLRF($124M). NSUPF YTD gains are higher at: 237.327 vs. STLRF (75.637). NSUPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -16.45M vs. STLRF (-33.09M). STLRF has more cash in the bank: 15.9M vs. NSUPF (9.94M). NSUPF (0) and STLRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NSUPFSTLRFNSUPF / STLRF
Capitalization200M124M161%
EBITDA-16.45M-33.09M50%
Gain YTD237.32775.637314%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash9.94M15.9M62%
Total DebtN/A1.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSUPF vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
NSUPF
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7173
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
9996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLRF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSUPF (96). This means that STLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STLRF (100). This means that NSUPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

STLRF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NSUPF (99). This means that STLRF’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (37). This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (100). This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSUPFSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEMVX10.03-0.02
-0.20%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq W
AWSYX17.65-0.06
-0.34%
Invesco Global Core Equity Y
AMRCX5.40-0.03
-0.55%
American Growth One C
MITHX38.23-0.22
-0.57%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R3
BIIGX39.35-0.42
-1.06%
Buffalo Growth Institutional

NSUPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSUPF has been loosely correlated with STLRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSUPF jumps, then STLRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSUPF
1D Price
Change %
NSUPF100%
-4.92%
STLRF - NSUPF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
CGLCF - NSUPF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.03%
LGDTF - NSUPF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
BCEKF - NSUPF
31%
Poorly correlated
+6.19%
BYAGF - NSUPF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with NSUPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then NSUPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
-1.94%
NSUPF - STLRF
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.92%
TORXF - STLRF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
CGLCF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.03%
SMAGF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
MAUTF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
More