Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSRSX vs WCMNX
NSRSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMNX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$53.62
Change-$2.66 (-4.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets537.53M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
NSRSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 538M vs. WCMNX (41.9M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.03 vs. WCMNX (-3.16). NSRSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.82 vs. WCMNX (3.45).
| NSRSX | WCMNX | NSRSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.24 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.04 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.941 | 6.304 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 538M | 41.9M | 1,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.03 | -3.16 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.68 | 22.08 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.82 | 3.45 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement