Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Small Cap Growth R6
Price$56.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets554.55M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.80
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.47M
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 555M vs. WCMLX (47.5M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. NSRSX (10.43). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.44 vs. NSRSX (-4.30).
| NSRSX | WCMLX | NSRSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.145 | 7.558 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 47.5M | 1,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.43 | 13.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.94 | 29.48 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.30 | -2.44 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement