NSRPF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
36.73M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PAEKY
Price
$20.00
Change
+$2.38 (+13.51%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.85B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSRPF vs PAEKY

Header iconNSRPF vs PAEKY Comparison
Open Charts NSRPF vs PAEKYBanner chart's image
Novo Resources
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$168.44K
Capitalization36.73M
PT Aneka Tambang TBK
Price$20.00
Change+$2.38 (+13.51%)
Volume$810
Capitalization4.85B
NSRPF vs PAEKY Comparison Chart in %
NSRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAEKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSRPF vs. PAEKY commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRPF is a Hold and PAEKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (NSRPF: $0.11 vs. PAEKY: $20.00)
Brand notoriety: NSRPF and PAEKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSRPF: 70% vs. PAEKY: 269%
Market capitalization -- NSRPF: $36.73M vs. PAEKY: $4.85B
NSRPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $36.73M. PAEKY’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSRPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAEKY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NSRPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAEKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAEKY is a better buy in the long-term than NSRPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSRPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAEKY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSRPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAEKY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAEKY is a better buy in the short-term than NSRPF.

Price Growth

NSRPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +27.80% price change this week, while PAEKY (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1771.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.75% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAEKY($4.85B) has a higher market cap than NSRPF($36.7M). PAEKY YTD gains are higher at: 201.865 vs. NSRPF (83.866). PAEKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.72T vs. NSRPF (-41.25M). PAEKY has more cash in the bank: 10.8T vs. NSRPF (5.98M). NSRPF has less debt than PAEKY: NSRPF (367K) vs PAEKY (567B). PAEKY has higher revenues than NSRPF: PAEKY (105.02T) vs NSRPF (0).
NSRPFPAEKYNSRPF / PAEKY
Capitalization36.7M4.85B1%
EBITDA-41.25M9.72T-0%
Gain YTD83.866201.86542%
P/E RatioN/A11.75-
Revenue0105.02T-
Total Cash5.98M10.8T0%
Total Debt367K567B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSRPF vs PAEKY: Fundamental Ratings
NSRPF
PAEKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2646
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10030
SMR RATING
1..100
9924
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10078
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAEKY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSRPF (96). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than NSRPF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSRPF (100). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than NSRPF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSRPF (99). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than NSRPF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NSRPF (37). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew similarly to NSRPF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as NSRPF (100). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew similarly to NSRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSRPFPAEKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAEKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URTY56.322.26
+4.18%
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
FLEE34.990.16
+0.45%
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
ALITF17.00N/A
N/A
ALLIANCE WITAN PLC
ETV14.19-0.04
-0.28%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
MCH28.66-0.34
-1.18%
Matthews China Active ETF

NSRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSRPF and HGMCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSRPF and HGMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSRPF
1D Price
Change %
NSRPF100%
-2.32%
HGMCF - NSRPF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CGLCF - NSRPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.66%
WHGOF - NSRPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-15.87%
STLRF - NSRPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
LOMLF - NSRPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
More

PAEKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PAEKY and ORLA have been poorly correlated (+-1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAEKY and ORLA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAEKY
1D Price
Change %
PAEKY100%
N/A
ORLA - PAEKY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+14.27%
ORZCF - PAEKY
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
OMMSF - PAEKY
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORFDF - PAEKY
-5%
Poorly correlated
+14.11%
OPWEF - PAEKY
-8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More