Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSOPX vs RGNBX
NSOPX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts NSOPX vs RGNBX
North Star Opportunity A
Price$18.51
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.66M
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$22.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
NSOPX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSOPX vs. RGNBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSOPX is a Buy and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. NSOPX (139M). NSOPX (0.97) and RGNBX (0.93) have matching dividends . NSOPX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: NSOPX (14 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). NSOPX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RGNBX (1.40). NSOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). RGNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSOPX: RGNBX (250) vs NSOPX (2500). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.01 vs. NSOPX (6.58). RGNBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.94 vs. NSOPX (12.91).
| NSOPX | RGNBX | NSOPX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.40 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.40 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.629 | 18.225 | 42% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139M | 21.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.93 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.58 | 13.01 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.93 | 45.53 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.91 | 35.94 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.04 | 79.94 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers