Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNCX vs WCMLX
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNCX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C
Price$52.51
Change-$0.67 (-1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets535.76M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
NSNCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNCX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNCX has more cash in the bank: 536M vs. WCMLX (43M). NSNCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNCX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). NSNCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). NSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. WCMLX (1.70). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. NSNCX (9.06).
| NSNCX | WCMLX | NSNCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.99 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.79 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.510 | 7.232 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 536M | 43M | 1,247% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 1.70 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.68 | 33.88 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.06 | 12.48 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement