NSLYF
Price
$17.95
Change
-$0.66 (-3.55%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.17B
TUFBY
Price
$6.00
Change
-$0.15 (-2.44%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSLYF vs TUFBY

Header iconNSLYF vs TUFBY Comparison
Open Charts NSLYF vs TUFBYBanner chart's image
Nestle Malaysia BHD
Price$17.95
Change-$0.66 (-3.55%)
Volume$700
Capitalization5.17B
Thai Union Group Public
Price$6.00
Change-$0.15 (-2.44%)
Volume$305
Capitalization1.49B
NSLYF vs TUFBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TUFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSLYF vs. TUFBY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSLYF is a Buy and TUFBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NSLYF: $17.95 vs. TUFBY: $6.00)
Brand notoriety: NSLYF and TUFBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSLYF: 105% vs. TUFBY: 23%
Market capitalization -- NSLYF: $5.17B vs. TUFBY: $1.49B
NSLYF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $5.17B. TUFBY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSLYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTUFBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSLYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TUFBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NSLYF is a better buy in the long-term than TUFBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSLYF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUFBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSLYF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TUFBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TUFBY is a better buy in the short-term than NSLYF.

Price Growth

NSLYF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TUFBY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSLYF($5.17B) has a higher market cap than TUFBY($1.49B). NSLYF has higher P/E ratio than TUFBY: NSLYF (44.58) vs TUFBY (8.57). TUFBY YTD gains are higher at: -22.175 vs. NSLYF (-25.271).
NSLYFTUFBYNSLYF / TUFBY
Capitalization5.17B1.49B346%
EBITDA815MN/A-
Gain YTD-25.271-22.175114%
P/E Ratio44.588.57520%
Revenue6.36BN/A-
Total Cash19.6MN/A-
Total Debt1.04BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSLYF vs TUFBY: Fundamental Ratings
NSLYF
TUFBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4698
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
1773
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3981
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TUFBY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSLYF (37). This means that TUFBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TUFBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as NSLYF (100). This means that TUFBY’s stock grew similarly to NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

NSLYF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUFBY (73). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUFBY’s over the last 12 months.

NSLYF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as TUFBY (64). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew similarly to TUFBY’s over the last 12 months.

NSLYF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUFBY (81). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUFBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSLYFTUFBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TUFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOCT32.370.12
+0.37%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
FOPC25.960.08
+0.33%
Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF
ETV14.070.02
+0.14%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
FCG23.31-0.53
-2.22%
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
GLIV7.70-0.30
-3.75%
Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT)

NSLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSLYF and DDC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSLYF and DDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSLYF
1D Price
Change %
NSLYF100%
N/A
DDC - NSLYF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
QQFSF - NSLYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYCF - NSLYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-14.80%
TYCMY - NSLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
OCGPF - NSLYF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TUFBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TUFBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TUFBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TUFBY
1D Price
Change %
TUFBY100%
N/A
WLMIF - TUFBY
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
TYCMY - TUFBY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
RRSFF - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDSYA - TUFBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More