NSLYF
Price
$17.95
Change
-$0.66 (-3.55%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.19B
OCGPF
Price
$2.96
Change
+$0.31 (+11.70%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
351M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSLYF vs OCGPF

Header iconNSLYF vs OCGPF Comparison
Open Charts NSLYF vs OCGPFBanner chart's image
Nestle Malaysia BHD
Price$17.95
Change-$0.66 (-3.55%)
Volume$700
Capitalization5.19B
Oceana Group
Price$2.96
Change+$0.31 (+11.70%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization351M
NSLYF vs OCGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSLYF vs. OCGPF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSLYF is a Buy and OCGPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NSLYF: $17.95 vs. OCGPF: $2.96)
Brand notoriety: NSLYF and OCGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSLYF: 109% vs. OCGPF: 376%
Market capitalization -- NSLYF: $5.19B vs. OCGPF: $351M
NSLYF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $5.19B. OCGPF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $351M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $238.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSLYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOCGPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NSLYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OCGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NSLYF is a better buy in the long-term than OCGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSLYF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCGPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSLYF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • OCGPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCGPF is a better buy in the short-term than NSLYF.

Price Growth

NSLYF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OCGPF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.73% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSLYF($5.19B) has a higher market cap than OCGPF($351M). NSLYF has higher P/E ratio than OCGPF: NSLYF (44.55) vs OCGPF (7.97). OCGPF YTD gains are higher at: -15.429 vs. NSLYF (-25.271). OCGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. NSLYF (815M). OCGPF has more cash in the bank: 830M vs. NSLYF (19.6M). NSLYF has less debt than OCGPF: NSLYF (1.04B) vs OCGPF (4.49B). OCGPF has higher revenues than NSLYF: OCGPF (10.2B) vs NSLYF (6.36B).
NSLYFOCGPFNSLYF / OCGPF
Capitalization5.19B351M1,479%
EBITDA815M1.34B61%
Gain YTD-25.271-15.429164%
P/E Ratio44.557.97559%
Revenue6.36B10.2B62%
Total Cash19.6M830M2%
Total Debt1.04B4.49B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSLYF vs OCGPF: Fundamental Ratings
NSLYF
OCGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4643
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3932
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCGPF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSLYF (37). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NSLYF (100). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

NSLYF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OCGPF (96). This means that NSLYF’s stock grew significantly faster than OCGPF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as NSLYF (62). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as NSLYF (39). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to NSLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSLYFOCGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OCGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILGCX23.040.21
+0.92%
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
JDNNX77.540.44
+0.57%
Janus Henderson Growth And Income N
BHEIX29.270.04
+0.14%
BlackRock High Equity Income K
JEEBX16.75-0.01
-0.06%
JHancock Infrastructure A
LSHAX27.01-0.78
-2.81%
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv A

NSLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSLYF and DDC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSLYF and DDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSLYF
1D Price
Change %
NSLYF100%
N/A
DDC - NSLYF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
QQFSF - NSLYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYCF - NSLYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+22.69%
TYCMY - NSLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
OCGPF - NSLYF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OCGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCGPF and NSLYF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCGPF and NSLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGPF
1D Price
Change %
OCGPF100%
N/A
NSLYF - OCGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRSFF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDSYA - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOSCF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More