NSGCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.82M
NVGLF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSGCF vs NVGLF

Header iconNSGCF vs NVGLF Comparison
Open Charts NSGCF vs NVGLFBanner chart's image
NORTHSTAR GOLD
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization2.82M
NV Gold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$4.6K
Capitalization2.3M
NSGCF vs NVGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSGCF vs. NVGLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSGCF is a Hold and NVGLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NSGCF: $0.02 vs. NVGLF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: NSGCF and NVGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSGCF: 2% vs. NVGLF: 62%
Market capitalization -- NSGCF: $2.82M vs. NVGLF: $2.3M
NSGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.82M. NVGLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSGCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVGLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NVGLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVGLF is a better buy in the long-term than NSGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSGCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVGLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NVGLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVGLF is a better buy in the short-term than NSGCF.

Price Growth

NSGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.61% price change this week, while NVGLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSGCF($2.82M) has a higher market cap than NVGLF($2.3M). NSGCF YTD gains are higher at: -1.362 vs. NVGLF (-12.353). NVGLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -308.57K vs. NSGCF (-1.69M). NSGCF has more cash in the bank: 281K vs. NVGLF (11K). NSGCF (0) and NVGLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NSGCFNVGLFNSGCF / NVGLF
Capitalization2.82M2.3M123%
EBITDA-1.69M-308.57K549%
Gain YTD-1.362-12.35311%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash281K11K2,555%
Total DebtN/A106K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NVGLF: Fundamental Ratings
NVGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSGCFNVGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUL61.292.33
+3.95%
HB Fuller Company
SVRE1.840.04
+2.22%
SaverOne 2014 Ltd
SIBN16.350.13
+0.80%
SI-BONE
FE43.470.07
+0.16%
FirstEnergy Corp
DCGO1.51-0.04
-2.58%
DocGo

NSGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSGCF and CALRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSGCF and CALRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSGCF
1D Price
Change %
NSGCF100%
-0.26%
CALRF - NSGCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALVLF - NSGCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
GGLDF - NSGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
NSUPF - NSGCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
NVGLF - NSGCF
-9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVGLF and PMDRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVGLF and PMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVGLF
1D Price
Change %
NVGLF100%
N/A
PMDRF - NVGLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - NVGLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - NVGLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
NSRPF - NVGLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
NSGCF - NVGLF
-9%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%