Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFOX vs RHLTX
NSFOX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. NSFOX (3.22M). NSFOX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: NSFOX (1.24) vs RHLTX (0.91). NSFOX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: NSFOX (4 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). NSFOX (4.55) is less costly to investors than RHLTX (0.53). NSFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). RHLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFOX: RHLTX (250) vs NSFOX (1000000). RHLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.60 vs. NSFOX (-7.02).
| NSFOX | RHLTX | NSFOX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.53 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.55 | 0.53 | 858% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.274 | 12.779 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.22M | 5.12B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.02 | 17.60 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.92 | 50.56 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 63.44 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement