Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFMX vs RCNTX
NSFMX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFMX vs. RCNTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFMX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCNTX has more cash in the bank: 17.4B vs. NSFMX (6.02M). NSFMX pays higher dividends than RCNTX: NSFMX (1.28) vs RCNTX (0.52). NSFMX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: NSFMX (8 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). NSFMX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RCNTX (1.03). NSFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RCNTX (5.00). RCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFMX: RCNTX (250) vs NSFMX (1000000). RCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.42 vs. NSFMX (-38.29). RCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. NSFMX (-28.29).
| NSFMX | RCNTX | NSFMX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.03 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 1.03 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -39.418 | 12.486 | -316% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.02M | 17.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.52 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | -38.29 | 16.42 | -233% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.31 | 43.23 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.29 | 47.47 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement