Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFKX vs RBITX
NSFKX vs RBITX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFKX vs. RBITX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFKX is a StrongBuy and RBITX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBITX has more cash in the bank: 37.8B vs. NSFKX (15M). NSFKX pays higher dividends than RBITX: NSFKX (1.33) vs RBITX (0.31). NSFKX was incepted earlier than RBITX: NSFKX (8 years) vs RBITX (18 years). NSFKX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RBITX (1.46). NSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RBITX (5.00). RBITX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFKX: RBITX (250) vs NSFKX (1000000). RBITX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. NSFKX (7.95). RBITX return over 5 years is better than : 43.17 vs. NSFKX (34.54).
| NSFKX | RBITX | NSFKX / RBITX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.46 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.341 | 10.769 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15M | 37.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.31 | 431% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 12.31 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.10 | 39.45 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.54 | 43.17 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement