Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFJX vs RBHTX
NSFJX vs RBHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFJX vs. RBHTX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFJX is a Hold and RBHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHTX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. NSFJX (6.41M). NSFJX pays higher dividends than RBHTX: NSFJX (1.42) vs RBHTX (0.42). NSFJX was incepted earlier than RBHTX: NSFJX (8 years) vs RBHTX (18 years). RBHTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than NSFJX (1.27). NSFJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RBHTX (5.00). RBHTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFJX: RBHTX (250) vs NSFJX (1000000). RBHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.47 vs. NSFJX (-44.00). RBHTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.52 vs. NSFJX (-32.96).
| NSFJX | RBHTX | NSFJX / RBHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.46 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.46 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -44.790 | 12.120 | -370% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.41M | 42.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.42 | 334% |
| Returns for 1 year | -44.00 | 15.47 | -285% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.54 | 38.62 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.96 | 41.52 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement