Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFJX vs RBHTX
NSFJX vs RBHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFJX vs. RBHTX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFJX is a StrongBuy and RBHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHTX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. NSFJX (15.4M). NSFJX pays higher dividends than RBHTX: NSFJX (1.42) vs RBHTX (0.42). NSFJX was incepted earlier than RBHTX: NSFJX (8 years) vs RBHTX (18 years). NSFJX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RBHTX (1.46). NSFJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RBHTX (5.00). RBHTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFJX: RBHTX (250) vs NSFJX (1000000). RBHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.36 vs. NSFJX (6.81). RBHTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.02 vs. NSFJX (33.01).
| NSFJX | RBHTX | NSFJX / RBHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.46 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.46 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.803 | 10.746 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4M | 41.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.42 | 334% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 12.36 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.49 | 38.92 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.01 | 43.02 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement