Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFHX vs RBKTX
NSFHX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFHX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFHX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. NSFHX (8.03M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: NSFHX (1.58) vs RBKTX (0.53). NSFHX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: NSFHX (8 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NSFHX (1.20). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). RBKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: RBKTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.83 vs. NSFHX (-29.32). RBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.77 vs. NSFHX (-19.52).
| NSFHX | RBKTX | NSFHX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.45 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -30.300 | 11.643 | -260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03M | 48.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.53 | 298% |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.32 | 14.83 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.49 | 37.15 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.52 | 39.77 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement