Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFHX vs RBEKX
NSFHX vs RBEKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFHX vs. RBEKX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFHX is a Hold and RBEKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEKX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. NSFHX (8.03M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than RBEKX: NSFHX (1.58) vs RBEKX (0.78). NSFHX was incepted earlier than RBEKX: NSFHX (8 years) vs RBEKX (11 years). NSFHX (1.20) and RBEKX (1.16) have similar cost to investors . NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBEKX (6.00). RBEKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: RBEKX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). RBEKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.16 vs. NSFHX (-29.32). RBEKX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. NSFHX (-19.52).
| NSFHX | RBEKX | NSFHX / RBEKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.16 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.16 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -30.300 | 11.794 | -257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03M | 48.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.78 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.32 | 15.16 | -193% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.49 | 38.04 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.52 | 41.37 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement