Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFGX vs RCFTX
NSFGX vs RCFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFGX vs. RCFTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFGX is a Hold and RCFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCFTX has more cash in the bank: 52.3B vs. NSFGX (8.43M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than RCFTX: NSFGX (2.09) vs RCFTX (1.29). NSFGX was incepted earlier than RCFTX: NSFGX (8 years) vs RCFTX (18 years). NSFGX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RCFTX (0.98). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RCFTX (7.00). RCFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: RCFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). RCFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.62 vs. NSFGX (-13.24). RCFTX return over 5 years is better than : 34.73 vs. NSFGX (-2.36).
| NSFGX | RCFTX | NSFGX / RCFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.98 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.98 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.852 | 10.546 | -131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.43M | 52.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 1.29 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.24 | 12.62 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.16 | 32.50 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.36 | 34.73 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement