Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFGX vs RCFTX
NSFGX vs RCFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFGX vs. RCFTX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFGX is a Buy and RCFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCFTX has more cash in the bank: 50.5B vs. NSFGX (15.4M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than RCFTX: NSFGX (2.15) vs RCFTX (1.34). NSFGX was incepted earlier than RCFTX: NSFGX (8 years) vs RCFTX (18 years). NSFGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RCFTX (0.98). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RCFTX (7.00). RCFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: RCFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). RCFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. NSFGX (-0.62). RCFTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.20 vs. NSFGX (16.94).
| NSFGX | RCFTX | NSFGX / RCFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.98 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.98 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.893 | 5.996 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4M | 50.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 1.34 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.62 | 8.10 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.69 | 30.88 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.94 | 36.20 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers