Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFGX vs RBFTX
NSFGX vs RBFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFGX vs. RBFTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFGX is a Hold and RBFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBFTX has more cash in the bank: 52.3B vs. NSFGX (8.43M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than RBFTX: NSFGX (2.09) vs RBFTX (0.91). NSFGX was incepted earlier than RBFTX: NSFGX (8 years) vs RBFTX (18 years). RBFTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than NSFGX (1.30). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RBFTX (7.00). RBFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: RBFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). RBFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. NSFGX (-13.24). RBFTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.29 vs. NSFGX (-2.36).
| NSFGX | RBFTX | NSFGX / RBFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.43 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.43 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.852 | 10.261 | -135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.43M | 52.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 0.91 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.24 | 12.06 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.16 | 31.02 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.36 | 32.29 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement