Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFFX vs RCETX
NSFFX vs RCETX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RCETX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a Hold and RCETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCETX has more cash in the bank: 51.2B vs. NSFFX (6.44M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RCETX: NSFFX (2.27) vs RCETX (1.62). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RCETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RCETX (18 years). NSFFX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RCETX (0.97). NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RCETX (7.00). RCETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RCETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RCETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. NSFFX (-8.63). RCETX return over 5 years is better than : 27.30 vs. NSFFX (3.58).
| NSFFX | RCETX | NSFFX / RCETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.97 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.97 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.337 | 9.535 | -98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44M | 51.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.62 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.63 | 11.89 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.98 | 28.76 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.58 | 27.30 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement