Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFFX vs RCETX
NSFFX vs RCETX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RCETX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a StrongBuy and RCETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCETX has more cash in the bank: 50.9B vs. NSFFX (10.3M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RCETX: NSFFX (2.27) vs RCETX (1.62). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RCETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RCETX (18 years). NSFFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RCETX (0.97). NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RCETX (7.00). RCETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RCETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RCETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.54 vs. NSFFX (1.38). RCETX return over 5 years is better than : 28.79 vs. NSFFX (18.30).
| NSFFX | RCETX | NSFFX / RCETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.97 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.97 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.672 | 8.652 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3M | 50.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.62 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.38 | 10.54 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.32 | 29.01 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.30 | 28.79 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers