Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFFX vs RBETX
NSFFX vs RBETX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RBETX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 51.2B vs. NSFFX (6.44M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RBETX: NSFFX (2.27) vs RBETX (1.25). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RBETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) and NSFFX (1.39) have similar cost to investors . NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). RBETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RBETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RBETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.37 vs. NSFFX (-8.63). RBETX return over 5 years is better than : 24.91 vs. NSFFX (3.58).
| NSFFX | RBETX | NSFFX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.42 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.42 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.337 | 9.248 | -101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44M | 51.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.25 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.63 | 11.37 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.98 | 27.27 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.58 | 24.91 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement