Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFFX vs RBETX
NSFFX vs RBETX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFFX vs. RBETX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFFX is a StrongBuy and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 50.9B vs. NSFFX (10.3M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than RBETX: NSFFX (2.27) vs RBETX (1.25). NSFFX was incepted earlier than RBETX: NSFFX (8 years) vs RBETX (18 years). NSFFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RBETX (1.42). NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). RBETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: RBETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). RBETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. NSFFX (1.38). RBETX return over 5 years is better than : 26.30 vs. NSFFX (18.30).
| NSFFX | RBETX | NSFFX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.42 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.42 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.672 | 8.353 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3M | 50.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.25 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.38 | 9.93 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.32 | 27.52 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.30 | 26.30 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers