Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFEX vs RFDTX
NSFEX vs RFDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFEX vs. RFDTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFEX is a Hold and RFDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.8B vs. NSFEX (2.07M). RFDTX (2.64) and NSFEX (2.56) have matching dividends . NSFEX was incepted earlier than RFDTX: NSFEX (8 years) vs RFDTX (16 years). NSFEX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RFDTX (0.31). NSFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RFDTX (10.00). RFDTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFEX: RFDTX (250) vs NSFEX (1000000). RFDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.08 vs. NSFEX (1.50). RFDTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.88 vs. NSFEX (6.03).
| NSFEX | RFDTX | NSFEX / RFDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.31 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.31 | 723% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.301 | 9.085 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07M | 32.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 2.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | 10.08 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.45 | 24.90 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.03 | 23.88 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement