Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFDX vs RHCTX
NSFDX vs RHCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFDX vs. RHCTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFDX is a Hold and RHCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHCTX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. NSFDX (1.01M). NSFDX pays higher dividends than RHCTX: NSFDX (2.92) vs RHCTX (2.70). NSFDX was incepted earlier than RHCTX: NSFDX (8 years) vs RHCTX (10 years). NSFDX (3.49) is less costly to investors than RHCTX (0.44). NSFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RHCTX (5.00). RHCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFDX: RHCTX (250) vs NSFDX (1000000). RHCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. NSFDX (1.59). RHCTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.05 vs. NSFDX (-7.90).
| NSFDX | RHCTX | NSFDX / RHCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.44 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.49 | 0.44 | 793% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.113 | 8.846 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01M | 15.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 2.70 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.59 | 9.77 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.98 | 22.76 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.90 | 21.05 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement