NSFDF
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.01 (-1.56%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
73.67M
PSYTF
Price
$8.11
Change
-$0.50 (-5.81%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
635.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSFDF vs PSYTF

Header iconNSFDF vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts NSFDF vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
NXT Energy Solutions
Price$0.63
Change-$0.01 (-1.56%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization73.67M
Pason Systems
Price$8.11
Change-$0.50 (-5.81%)
Volume$50.85K
Capitalization635.61M
NSFDF vs PSYTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSFDF vs. PSYTF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFDF is a Hold and PSYTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (NSFDF: $0.63 vs. PSYTF: $8.11)
Brand notoriety: NSFDF and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSFDF: 9% vs. PSYTF: 495%
Market capitalization -- NSFDF: $73.67M vs. PSYTF: $635.61M
NSFDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $73.67M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $635.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $49.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSFDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NSFDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NSFDF and PSYTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSFDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSYTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSFDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSFDF is a better buy in the short-term than PSYTF.

Price Growth

NSFDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +1.94% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -5.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.68% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($636M) has a higher market cap than NSFDF($73.7M). NSFDF YTD gains are higher at: 479.597 vs. PSYTF (-13.503). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 153M vs. NSFDF (3.2M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 87.4M vs. NSFDF (2.03M). NSFDF has less debt than PSYTF: NSFDF (12.7M) vs PSYTF (14.9M). PSYTF has higher revenues than NSFDF: PSYTF (423M) vs NSFDF (12.5M).
NSFDFPSYTFNSFDF / PSYTF
Capitalization73.7M636M12%
EBITDA3.2M153M2%
Gain YTD479.597-13.503-3,552%
P/E RatioN/A11.99-
Revenue12.5M423M3%
Total Cash2.03M87.4M2%
Total Debt12.7M14.9M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSFDF vs PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
NSFDF
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6468
SMR RATING
1..100
8355
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3480
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9128
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8515

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NSFDF (50). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (68). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as NSFDF (83). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

NSFDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSYTF (80). This means that NSFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSFDF (91). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSFDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSFDFPSYTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NABZY12.780.12
+0.95%
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
BYSD0.70N/A
N/A
Bayside Corp.
NPKYY8.46N/A
N/A
Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.
NEXXY6.25N/A
N/A
NEXI S.P.A.
TGMPF2.12-0.04
-1.85%
Tantalus Systems Holding Inc.

NSFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSFDF and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSFDF and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSFDF
1D Price
Change %
NSFDF100%
-1.20%
PLSDF - NSFDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
PSYTF - NSFDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-5.81%
HGHAF - NSFDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCF - NSFDF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - NSFDF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NGS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
-5.81%
NGS - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
SUBCY - PSYTF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
SBOEY - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCRF - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
QSEP - PSYTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
More