Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFBX vs RHBTX
NSFBX vs RHBTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFBX vs. RHBTX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFBX is a Hold and RHBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.82B vs. NSFBX (513K). NSFBX pays higher dividends than RHBTX: NSFBX (3.54) vs RHBTX (2.87). NSFBX was incepted earlier than RHBTX: NSFBX (8 years) vs RHBTX (10 years). NSFBX (3.52) is less costly to investors than RHBTX (0.44). NSFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RHBTX (6.00). RHBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFBX: RHBTX (250) vs NSFBX (1000000). RHBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. NSFBX (-0.37). RHBTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.35 vs. NSFBX (-8.44).
| NSFBX | RHBTX | NSFBX / RHBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.52 | 0.44 | 800% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 8.306 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513K | 4.82B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 2.87 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | 9.12 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.22 | 20.81 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.44 | 21.35 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement