Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMEBX
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMEBX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$23.02
Change+$0.39 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets469.33M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. NSEIX (469M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NSEIX (1.63) vs RMEBX (1.08). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NSEIX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSEIX (28.42). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMEBX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. NSEIX (5.70). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. NSEIX (23.37).
| NSEIX | RMEBX | NSEIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.636 | 2.231 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 469M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.08 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 7.30 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.75 | 28.21 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.37 | 43.15 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.45 | 103.95 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers