Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMEBX
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMEBX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$22.51
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.36M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NSEIX (466M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NSEIX (1.75) vs RMEBX (1.09). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NSEIX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSEIX (28.42). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMEBX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. NSEIX (3.54). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. NSEIX (34.71).
| NSEIX | RMEBX | NSEIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.996 | 11.308 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 466M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.09 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 7.57 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 31.59 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.71 | 55.29 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.79 | 89.40 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement