Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMEBX
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMEBX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$22.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets468.73M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NSEIX (469M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NSEIX (1.81) vs RMEBX (1.12). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NSEIX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSEIX (28.42). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMEBX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. NSEIX (6.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. NSEIX (37.83).
| NSEIX | RMEBX | NSEIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.562 | 11.253 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 469M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.12 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.73 | 11.26 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.79 | 30.31 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.83 | 59.35 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.80 | 80.17 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers