Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSDVX vs SSGSX
NSDVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NSDVX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
NSDVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSDVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSDVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. NSDVX (90.8M). NSDVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NSDVX (2.57) vs SSGSX (0.58). NSDVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NSDVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). NSDVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. NSDVX (34.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSDVX: SSGSX (2500) vs NSDVX (5000). NSDVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. SSGSX (3.83). NSDVX return over 5 years is better than : 12.34 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| NSDVX | SSGSX | NSDVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.23 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.23 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.628 | 8.123 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.8M | 5.04B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 0.58 | 446% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 3.83 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.99 | -3.10 | -322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.34 | -0.23 | -5,451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.49 | 53.01 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement