Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBRX vs RWMFX
NSBRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBRX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth I
Price$65.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.46B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
NSBRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. NSBRX (6.46B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBRX: RWMFX (1.43) vs NSBRX (1.05). NSBRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBRX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NSBRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBRX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBRX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBRX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. NSBRX (4.73). NSBRX return over 5 years is better than : 57.01 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| NSBRX | RWMFX | NSBRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.077 | 8.213 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 205B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.43 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 7.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.35 | 34.82 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.01 | 50.81 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.07 | 83.34 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers