Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBRX vs RWMFX
NSBRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBRX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth I
Price$62.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.65B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
NSBRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. NSBRX (6.65B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBRX: RWMFX (1.38) vs NSBRX (1.02). NSBRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBRX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBRX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBRX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBRX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. NSBRX (0.62). NSBRX (44.33) and RWMFX (42.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSBRX | RWMFX | NSBRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.672 | 8.281 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.65B | 209B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.38 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.62 | 6.14 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.96 | 33.03 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.33 | 42.32 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.36 | 81.05 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers