Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth R6
Price$65.53
Change+$0.46 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.56
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. NSBFX (6.45B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.48) vs NSBFX (1.12). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NSBFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSBFX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). NSBFX (8.11) and RWMFX (7.88) have marching annual gain over last year. NSBFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.69 vs. RWMFX (56.79).
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.31 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.31 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.294 | 5.739 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 202B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.48 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 7.88 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.20 | 32.20 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.69 | 56.79 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.40 | 71.15 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers