Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth R6
Price$65.75
Change+$0.35 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. NSBFX (6.44B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.48) vs NSBFX (1.12). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NSBFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBFX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. NSBFX (8.42). NSBFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.22 vs. RWMFX (54.74).
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.31 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.31 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.651 | 7.001 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 204B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.48 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 9.60 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.77 | 32.33 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.22 | 54.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.24 | 72.42 | 137% |