Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth R6
Price$63.22
Change-$0.77 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.95
Change-$0.64 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.44B
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. NSBFX (6.24B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.47) vs NSBFX (1.15). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NSBFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSBFX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). NSBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. RWMFX (4.65). NSBFX return over 5 years is better than : 63.02 vs. RWMFX (51.87).
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.31 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.31 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.225 | 1.465 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 194B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.47 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 4.65 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 24.78 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.02 | 51.87 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.14 | 61.07 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement