Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBCX vs VFFSX
NSBCX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NSBCX vs VFFSX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$65.90
Change+$0.08 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.46B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$318.54
Change+$0.69 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37T
NSBCX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBCX vs. VFFSX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBCX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.37T vs. NSBCX (6.46B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: VFFSX (1.18) vs NSBCX (0.15). NSBCX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NSBCX (19 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NSBCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NSBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NSBCX (2500) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.18 vs. NSBCX (5.07). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 91.26 vs. NSBCX (50.05).
| NSBCX | VFFSX | NSBCX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.01 | 16,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.01 | 16,700% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.463 | 10.725 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 1.37T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.18 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 20.18 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.81 | 59.80 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.05 | 91.26 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement