Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBCX vs RWMFX
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$62.80
Change-$4.10 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.69B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBCX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. NSBCX (6.69B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: RWMFX (1.45) vs NSBCX (0.15). NSBCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBCX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBCX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. NSBCX (0.47). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. NSBCX (35.22).
| NSBCX | RWMFX | NSBCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.31 | 535% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.31 | 535% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.635 | 1.520 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.69B | 208B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.45 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.47 | 5.51 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.08 | 30.53 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.22 | 37.79 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.93 | 98.02 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement