Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBCX vs RWMFX
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$62.31
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.61B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
NSBCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. NSBCX (6.61B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: RWMFX (1.38) vs NSBCX (0.13). NSBCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBCX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBCX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. NSBCX (-0.26). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.34 vs. NSBCX (37.24).
| NSBCX | RWMFX | NSBCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.31 | 535% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.31 | 535% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 8.297 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.61B | 209B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.38 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.26 | 6.45 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.23 | 33.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.24 | 42.34 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.58 | 82.48 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers