Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBAX vs RWMFX
NSBAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBAX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth A
Price$62.93
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.71B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.56
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
NSBAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. NSBAX (6.71B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: RWMFX (1.47) vs NSBAX (0.87). NSBAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBAX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBAX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.01 vs. NSBAX (4.00). NSBAX (41.27) and RWMFX (40.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSBAX | RWMFX | NSBAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.812 | 2.164 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.71B | 208B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.47 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | 10.01 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.47 | 31.75 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.27 | 40.22 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.09 | 102.43 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement