NSANF
Price
$2.31
Change
+$0.11 (+5.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
8.01B
POAHY
Price
$4.15
Change
-$0.06 (-1.43%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
13.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSANF vs POAHY

Header iconNSANF vs POAHY Comparison
Open Charts NSANF vs POAHYBanner chart's image
Nissan Motor
Price$2.31
Change+$0.11 (+5.00%)
Volume$2.63K
Capitalization8.01B
Porsche Automobile Holding SE
Price$4.15
Change-$0.06 (-1.43%)
Volume$131.96K
Capitalization13.03B
NSANF vs POAHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NSANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POAHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSANF vs. POAHY commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSANF is a Hold and POAHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (NSANF: $2.31 vs. POAHY: $4.15)
Brand notoriety: NSANF and POAHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSANF: 9% vs. POAHY: 108%
Market capitalization -- NSANF: $8.01B vs. POAHY: $13.03B
NSANF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $8.01B. POAHY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $13.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.06T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSANF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOAHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSANF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • POAHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NSANF and POAHY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSANF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POAHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSANF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • POAHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, POAHY is a better buy in the short-term than NSANF.

Price Growth

NSANF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while POAHY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -4.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-1.27% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
POAHY($13B) has a higher market cap than NSANF($8.01B). NSANF has higher P/E ratio than POAHY: NSANF (12.87) vs POAHY (3.00). POAHY YTD gains are higher at: 18.375 vs. NSANF (-28.372). NSANF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04T vs. POAHY (-21.56B). NSANF has more cash in the bank: 1.52T vs. POAHY (2.69B). POAHY has less debt than NSANF: POAHY (7.62B) vs NSANF (7.59T). NSANF has higher revenues than POAHY: NSANF (12.61T) vs POAHY (-21.65B).
NSANFPOAHYNSANF / POAHY
Capitalization8.01B13B62%
EBITDA1.04T-21.56B-4,800%
Gain YTD-28.37218.375-154%
P/E Ratio12.873.00430%
Revenue12.61T-21.65B-58,239%
Total Cash1.52T2.69B56,485%
Total Debt7.59T7.62B99,698%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSANF vs POAHY: Fundamental Ratings
NSANF
POAHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
708
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
650
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POAHY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as NSANF (17). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to NSANF’s over the last 12 months.

POAHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NSANF (100). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to NSANF’s over the last 12 months.

POAHY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NSANF (100). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to NSANF’s over the last 12 months.

POAHY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as NSANF (63). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to NSANF’s over the last 12 months.

NSANF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHY (50). This means that NSANF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSANFPOAHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POAHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOAU34.431.05
+3.15%
US Global GO GOLD and Prec Mtl Mnrs ETF
DBND46.06-0.09
-0.20%
DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF
CANQ28.91-0.20
-0.69%
Calamos Nasdaq® Equity & Income ETF
URTH174.55-1.33
-0.76%
iShares MSCI World ETF
IMAY28.56-0.24
-0.83%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - May

NSANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSANF and ISUZF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSANF and ISUZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSANF
1D Price
Change %
NSANF100%
+5.00%
ISUZF - NSANF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAHMF - NSANF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZDAF - NSANF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.22%
NFYEF - NSANF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
POAHY - NSANF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More

POAHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POAHY has been closely correlated with VWAPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if POAHY jumps, then VWAPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POAHY
1D Price
Change %
POAHY100%
-1.50%
VWAPY - POAHY
77%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
VWAGY - POAHY
74%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
MBGAF - POAHY
69%
Closely correlated
-1.68%
MBGYY - POAHY
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
RNLSY - POAHY
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
More