Advertisement
NRTZF vs OC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRTZF is a Hold and OC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NRTZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NRTZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NRTZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NRTZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- OC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NRTZF (@Building Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
OC is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+0.97% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| NRTZF | OC | NRTZF / OC | |
| Capitalization | 547M | 9.38B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 17.6B | 1.96B | 900% |
| Gain YTD | 3.827 | -31.699 | -12% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.90 | 15.02 | 93% |
| Revenue | 205B | 11.7B | 1,752% |
| Total Cash | 29.3B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.64B | 5.98B | 61% |
NRTZF | OC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NRTZF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as OC (34) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that NRTZF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.
OC's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as NRTZF (82) in the null industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to NRTZF’s over the last 12 months.
NRTZF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (81) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that NRTZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.
NRTZF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as OC (84) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that NRTZF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.
OC's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NRTZF (94) in the null industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NRTZF’s over the last 12 months.
| NRTZF | OC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
NRTZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NRTZF and OC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRTZF and OC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NRTZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRTZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OC - NRTZF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
| FBIN - NRTZF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BLDR - NRTZF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
| NIABY - NRTZF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JBI - NRTZF | 7% Poorly correlated | +5.29% | ||
More | ||||
OC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.