NRSCF
Price
$7.29
Change
+$0.67 (+10.12%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
21.69B
STGC
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 3 closing price
Capitalization
108.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NRSCF vs STGC

Header iconNRSCF vs STGC Comparison
Open Charts NRSCF vs STGCBanner chart's image
Nomura Holdings
Price$7.29
Change+$0.67 (+10.12%)
Volume$37.99K
Capitalization21.69B
STARTENGINE CROWDFUNDING
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$42.54K
Capitalization108.17M
NRSCF vs STGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NRSCF vs. STGC commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRSCF is a StrongBuy and STGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (NRSCF: $7.29 vs. STGC: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: NRSCF and STGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NRSCF: 495% vs. STGC: 100%
Market capitalization -- NRSCF: $21.69B vs. STGC: $108.17M
NRSCF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $21.69B. STGC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $108.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NRSCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the long-term than STGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NRSCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +10.12% price change this week, while STGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRSCF($21.7B) has a higher market cap than STGC($108M). NRSCF YTD gains are higher at: 26.915 vs. STGC (0.000). NRSCF has higher revenues than STGC: NRSCF (1.73T) vs STGC (97.2M).
NRSCFSTGCNRSCF / STGC
Capitalization21.7B108M20,093%
EBITDAN/A513K-
Gain YTD26.9150.000-
P/E Ratio8.74N/A-
Revenue1.73T97.2M1,779,835%
Total CashN/A26.3M-
Total Debt15.59TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NRSCFSTGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
33%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBTCX23.150.20
+0.87%
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology C
CREYX9.570.06
+0.63%
Columbia Real Estate Equity Inst3
PWCIX88.75-0.23
-0.26%
Principal Capital Appreciation Inst
ISMVX10.73-0.07
-0.65%
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Value I
PRPCX4.83-0.04
-0.74%
PGIM Jennison Energy Infrastructure C

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and SAIH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and SAIH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
SAIH - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
CCORF - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
STGC - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIGI - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.17%
MQBKY - NRSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More

STGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STGC and FLTLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STGC and FLTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STGC
1D Price
Change %
STGC100%
N/A
FLTLF - STGC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
NRSCF - STGC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBTTF - STGC
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
AVFCF - STGC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAIH - STGC
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
More